Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Not quite as promised

I opened up my freezer the other night to choose a side dish to go with the steak I was about to grill. Right there in front of me was a box of Kroger brand "Rice and Broccoli (with low fat cheese sauce)." Seemed like a decent choice, and it would be pretty easy to prepare.

Look at this tasty looking product, filled to the brim with pretty green broccoli heads and rice, covered in cheesy goodness:




And now look at the sad reality of what as in the package, after cooking:




I went to the Kroger website this morning and filled out a "customer contact form" telling them what a ripoff this product was. I've gotten the "automated acknowledgement" but no actual reply yet.

As an interesting sidenote, the automated email I received had my own email address as the sender. They also had a bit in the body of the email saying
You have received this email notification as a result of submitting a
Customer Comment to Kroger. If you did not submit a Customer Comment, please
contact a Customer Service Representative at 866-221-4141 and report the
following sender's IP Address: 6x.xx.xxx.xxx [my IP obscured]
So they're concerned about security (although sending rogue email comments to Kroger seems pretty low on the list of risky activities), but they have no problem with spoofing an email "from" address? Weird.

So anyway, my personal recommendation is to avoid the Kroger brand frozen vegetables. They're not what they appear to be.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

AOL's New Webmail

I've been being a bit of a gadfly on AOL's "mail blog" and support forums for their new webmail "service." I wonder if they're going to take away my screen name?

I've had a netscape.net email address for years, probably since before Netscape was purchased by AOL. I use that email for most of the commercial websites I deal with, such as airline frequent flyer programs, NetFlix, Papa John's Pizza, etc. I added an aim.com address simply because I had an AIM ID for use in chatting to some friends. I use that address very seldom, primarily for job search related emails. A while back, AOL combined the Netscape and AIM mailboxes, so that everything ends up in the same inbox. This wasn't all that much of a problem, although it's confused me a few times when writing emails since the "from" address defaults to the AIM name. No major problem though. A month or so ago, suddenly they unveiled this new "service". It's some kind of AJAX-y application that is a giant mess of usability miscues.


  • They show the contacts list in a panel on the right side of the screen. You can't not see this panel, although it can be closed. But closing it creates a tiny vertical strip on the right side of the screen, outside of the scroll bar. So if you slam your pointer to the side of the screen to click and skip down a page, you are just as likely to re-open the contacts list. In addition, the contacts list was fully populated with the return address of every SPAM sender that I'd ever received, including those that AOL itself had automatically filtered into the SPAM folder. As if I'd really need access to those addresses again. Supposedly this last thing has been fixed, but let's revisit that whole fixed thing later.

  • On startup, they also show a "Today on AIM" screen that covers more than half of the inbox. You can "hide" this window (or "curtain" as they call it), but there is no way to make it not appear at all. One of the developers who posts to the mail blog says it's because it helps to pay for this free service and that "all webmail has something like this." I would imagine that the ten other doubleclick.net ads on the page might also help pay the bills. In any case, I most extensively use gmail for my webmail. I don't see any "curtains" blocking my view. There are no ads at all on the main inbox page. Yes, there are ads when I read individual messages, but they are unobtrusive, they don't block half my screen. I also have a Yahoo email, which I mostly access via that My Yahoo page, but just for kicks, I checked the mail.yahoo.com page. Ads yes, obstructing curtains, no. So I'm at a loss to know what "all webmail" this guy is talking about.

  • This "service" often automatically updates itself, leaving one with a screen that says "your webmail has just been updated!" Well, whoopee. Why is a web page acting like an application? Why does AOL still want to get its sticky tendrils all over my computer? Isn't it bad enough that the AOL client was like an evergrowing fungus that became impossible to remove? Now a simple web page has to try to take over? I have also seen reports that this automatic update feature will happen even if one is in the midst of composing an email, and when it's done, your partially composed email is gone. Nice!


The initial question I asked on the mail blog was "did anybody do ANY usability testing on this?" It seems like a bunch of developers are sitting around, adding features that are "cool" with absolutely no regard to how this will affect users. I posted several instances of poor usability (including the above items). To his credit, the developer who runs the blog did respond, but then again, he said that I should move my "tech support questions" to the support forum. Of course they're not "tech support questions", but I did anyway. And then I blasted them for having a VERY poor design and not having tested it. Somebody on the blog said "why can't the 'send' button be easier to find?" That's a design and usability issue. The thing about the contacts list adding spammers? That's a design and usability issue.

When I was first blessed with this new application, I tried to find ways to not see the contacts list or today curtain. There was nothing in the configuration settings. I also wanted to be able to sort the contact list. Again, nothing. Now supposedly the sort thing has been added to the config. But How would I know that? Am I supposed to re-check the config screen every single time there's an update? That's a design, documentation and communication problem.

Bottom line, AOL has released a very early BETA product onto their whole user base. It's not labelled as such, but the frequency of updates makes it very clear that this thing was NOT ready for prime time. They've also announced that they will be releasing a "lite" version for "people with older computers or browsers." Way to know your user base there, guys! Again, one of the principle of usability/design is to KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE.

Maybe I Should Get It At Gimbel's

As many people know, last year, Macy's rebranded all of the various chains it had subsumed via the May and Federated mergers. It's hard to was nostalgic about the loss of Rich's and Hecht's and Strawbridge's, because frankly those chains were just vestigial remains of the grand old department stores that preceded them.

But that's not really what this post is about. I'd had a Hecht's credit card for some time, one that I barely used, but it occasionally would come in handy, particularly at Christmas time. One would have assumed that this card would have been replaced with a Macy's card after the rebranding. When I used the card for Christmas shopping, I was assured that a new one should be on its way.

Well, now it's June and I happened to see that old Hecht's card as I was doing some housework, so I thought it was time to follow-up on this missing replacement. I went to their website and found my way to the "contact us" page for credit card customer service. They have four options


  • EMail Us
    "We ask you to log-in for your security and to expedite the handling of your questions"
    Ummm, WTF? "Log in"? I don't want to "log in" I want to send you an email.

  • Text Chat
    OK, I tried that. Evidently that area of customer service was closed, so I received a pop-up asking me to enter the "skill" and "identifier". Again, WTF? Those are not fields that the customer should be seeing.

  • Talk Live
    At first I couldn't figure out what was different about this in comparison to Text Chat, but then I noticed that it requires a microphone and speakers, so essentially it's a VOIP application. Good enough. I clicked on the link and got a security warning from my browser. The certificate they want me to accept expired in 2002. I hate to repeat myself, but WTF? A five year old security certificate does not give me a warm fuzzy feeling. I guess I should be impressed that the system has not balked at my using Firefox.

  • Call Us
    I have to admit, I did try to call them on this topic once before. It was after I received the bill for my purchases last December. I'd got patched through to India, and while I have no general problem with outsourced call centers, I do require that the person on the phone speak relatively clear English. So I'd hung up. This time I went ahead and called. I got a bunch of recordings, then a bunch of clicks, and then hung up on. Nice. So I tried again, and finally got through to "Basil". He listened only about half the time, ignored some of my questions completely, and generally was not very helpful.


I think I might be getting a new Macy's card though. Which I probably should cut up into tiny pieces and send back to them.

Macy's Credit "Services" - you hereby receive the WORST CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE of the month award.